Urban Heat Democratization · Research wiki
Spectral Theory Contract
What the graph mathematics establishes exactly, what it cannot establish, and the evidence required to cross that boundary.
The object is a graph—not a city in full
The model analyses an undirected weighted graph of valid raster cells. Its edge weights encode documented assumptions about local gradient barriers and optional greenness. The resulting mathematics is rigorous about that graph; it is not a direct measurement of heat transport, lived access, health risk, or intervention performance.
What is guaranteed
For a connected, nonnegative weighted graph, the implementation computes the second normalized-Laplacian eigenpair and evaluates threshold sets along the Fiedler-vector ordering. The selected set is the lowest-conductance sweep cut—a reproducible, inspectable candidate, not an exhaustive search over all subsets.
Cheeger-type bounds explain why spectral connectivity and conductance are related. They do not validate the raster, weights, sink definition, or a causal theory of intervention.
What requires evidence beyond the graph
Read the complete Spectral Theory Contract, then inspect the canonical platform alongside its methods and caveats.
Explore on the Canonical Platform
Connect this research guide to live interactive modules on urban-heat.ai-aarti.com:
Inspect satellite thermal layers, bottleneck cuts, and localized cooling access.
Explore transparent what-if cooling options, budgets, and equity trade-offs.
Interactive OSM queries, microclimate sensor bench, and federal grant generator.
Model reflective roofs, urban canopy, and cool pavements with live feedback.
Explore spectral graph conductance, Fiedler vectors, and percolation dynamics.
Partner with research mentors, community advocates, and public agencies.